📑 Table of Contents

Inferential role semantics (also conceptual role semantics, functional role semantics, procedural semantics, semantic inferentialism) is an approach to the theory of meaning that identifies the meaning of an expression with its relationship to other expressions (typically its inferential relations with other expressions), in contradistinction to denotationalism, according to which denotations are the primary sort of meaning.[1]

Overview

edit

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel is considered an early proponent of what is now called inferentialism.[2][3] He believed that the ground for the axioms and the foundation for the validity of the inferences are the right consequences and that the axioms do not explain the consequence.[3]

In its current form, inferential role semantics originated in the work of Wilfrid Sellars.

Contemporary proponents of semantic inferentialism include Robert Brandom,[4][5] Gilbert Harman,[6] Paul Horwich, Ned Block,[7] and Luca Incurvati.[8]

Jerry Fodor coined the term "inferential role semantics" in order to criticise it as a holistic (i.e. essentially non-compositional) approach to the theory of meaning. Inferential role semantics is sometimes contrasted to truth-conditional semantics.

Semantic inferentialism is related to logical expressivism[9] and semantic anti-realism.[10] The approach also bears a resemblance to accounts of proof-theoretic semantics in the semantics of logic, which associate meaning with the reasoning process.

References

edit
  1. ^ Proof-Theoretic Semantics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  2. ^ Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik Vol. II, Meiner, 1975 [1932], pp. 466 and 474.
  3. ^ a b P. Stekeler-Weithofer (2016), "Hegel's Analytic Pragmatism" Archived 2020-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, University of Leipzig, pp. 122–4.
  4. ^ "Pragmatism and Inferentialism"
  5. ^ Brandom, Robert (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press. p. 230. ISBN 0-674-00158-3.
  6. ^ "(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics" by Gilbert Harman
  7. ^ "Conceptual Role Semantics" by Ned Block
  8. ^ "EXPRESS | From the Expression of Disagreement to New Foundations for Expressivist Semantics". Inferential Expressivism project website. A project funded by the European Research Council
  9. ^ J. Peregrin, Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, Springer, 2014, ch. 10.
  10. ^ R. Ramanujam, Sundar Sarukkai (eds.), Logic and Its Applications, Springer, 2009, p. 260.
edit

📚 Artikel Terkait di Wikipedia

Meaning (philosophy)

inferential role semantics, where: The meaning of sentences and grammatical constructs is given by their assertion conditions; and Such a semantics is

Proof-theoretic semantics

including the semantics of functional programming languages and the design of proof assistants. Inferential role semantics Truth-conditional semantics Logical

Inferential

(logic) Inferential mood (grammar) Inferential role semantics Inferential theory of learning Informal inferential reasoning Simple non-inferential passage

Concept

entities. For example, inference-based accounts, such as inferential role semantics, compare the roles that concepts play in patterns of inferences. Two-factor

Conceptual

Conceptual semantics Conceptual dictionary Conceptual change Conceptual dependency theory Conceptual domain in Frame semantics (linguistics) Inferential role semantics

Jerry Fodor

sharply with the inferential role semantics to which he subscribed earlier in his career. Fodor went on to criticize inferential role semantics (IRS) because

Proposition

are relevant to many fields. Logicians examine their logical form and inferential patterns as the premises and conclusions of arguments. Linguists investigate

Robert Brandom

or semantics. He advocates the view that the meaning of an expression is fixed by how it is used in inferences (see inferential role semantics). This