In mathematics, a function is superadditive if for all and in the domain of

Similarly, a sequence is called superadditive if it satisfies the inequality for all and

The term "superadditive" is also applied to functions from a boolean algebra to the real numbers where such as lower probabilities.

Examples of superadditive functions

edit
  • The map is a superadditive function for nonnegative real numbers because
  • The determinant is superadditive for nonnegative Hermitian matrix, that is, if are nonnegative Hermitian then This follows from the Minkowski determinant theorem, which more generally states that is superadditive (equivalently, concave)[1] for nonnegative Hermitian matrices of size : If are nonnegative Hermitian then
  • Horst Alzer proved[2] that Hadamard's gamma function is superadditive for all real numbers with [3]
  • Mutual information

Properties

edit

If is a superadditive function whose domain contains then To see this, simply set and in the defining inequality.

The negative of a superadditive function is subadditive.

Fekete's lemma

edit

The major reason for the use of superadditive sequences is the following lemma due to Michael Fekete.[4]

Lemma: (Fekete) For every superadditive sequence the limit is equal to the supremum (The limit may be positive infinity, as is the case with the sequence for example.)

The analogue of Fekete's lemma holds for subadditive functions as well. There are extensions of Fekete's lemma that do not require the definition of superadditivity above to hold for all and There are also results that allow one to deduce the rate of convergence to the limit whose existence is stated in Fekete's lemma if some kind of both superadditivity and subadditivity is present. A good exposition of this topic may be found in Steele (1997).[5][6]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ M. Marcus, H. Minc (1992). A survey in matrix theory and matrix inequalities. Dover. Theorem 4.1.8, page 115.
  2. ^ Horst Alzer (2009). "A superadditive property of Hadamard's gamma function". Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg. 79. Springer: 11–23. doi:10.1007/s12188-008-0009-5. S2CID 123691692.
  3. ^ Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A381340 (Decimal value of c > 1.5 for which H(2*c) = 2*H(c) for H = Hadamard's gamma function)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.
  4. ^ Fekete, M. (1923). "Über die Verteilung der Wurzeln bei gewissen algebraischen Gleichungen mit ganzzahligen Koeffizienten". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 17 (1): 228–249. doi:10.1007/BF01504345. S2CID 186223729.
  5. ^ Michael J. Steele (1997). Probability theory and combinatorial optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia. ISBN 0-89871-380-3.
  6. ^ Michael J. Steele (2011). CBMS Lectures on Probability Theory and Combinatorial Optimization. University of Cambridge.

Notes

  • György Polya and Gábor Szegö. (1976). Problems and theorems in analysis, volume 1. Springer-Verlag, New York. ISBN 0-387-05672-6.

This article incorporates material from Superadditivity on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

📚 Artikel Terkait di Wikipedia

Superadditive set function

In mathematics, a superadditive set function is a set function whose value when applied to the union of two disjoint sets is greater than or equal to

Choquet integral

A Choquet integral is a subadditive or superadditive integral created by the French mathematician Gustave Choquet in 1953. It was initially used in statistical

Superadditive developer

synergistic effect, called superadditive development. Superadditive development commonly means that the mathematical superadditive inequality holds for the

Fekete's lemma

{ a n } n = 1 ∞ {\displaystyle \{a_{n}\}_{n=1}^{\infty }} is called superadditive if and only if for all m , n ∈ N {\displaystyle m,n\in \mathbb {N} }

Cooperative game theory

smaller coalitions. Characteristic functions are often assumed to be superadditive (Owen 1995, p. 213). This means that the value of a union of disjoint

Welfare maximization

of fractionally-subadditive valuations. When agents' utilities are superadditive set functions (more general than supermodular), a ( log ⁡ m ) 1 + ϵ

Envy-freeness

share is worth even more. On the contrary, when the valuations are only superadditive, PR still implies EF with two partners, but EF no longer implies PR

Hadamard's gamma function

for positive integer values of x. The Hadamard's gamma function has a superadditive property: H ( x ) + H ( y ) ≤ H ( x + y ) , {\displaystyle H(x)+H(y)\leq